Wednesday, February 23, 2011

3d modular madness critique

 And if you thought that rape American Idol style wasn't too bad, how about gallery installation presentation rape style, mob technique?  Yea. It happened. The day was Wednesday, the 23 of February, and the dew was cold....

A 1. yes it does because the  pencil still kept they're long shape, even if cut up the pencil acted like a pencil.
2. if it could, it would have to be pens or something just as slender.
3. pencils are hard to glue together, even with super glue.
4. pencils are very uniquely and conveniently shaped.  I wanna shake the inventers hand.

B 1. Saddly, scale is lacking. But considering the difficulty of the material, the ambition level doesn't suffer as much.
2. size, and look. The plant growth in my head looked much different.
3. it could've been more ambitious. But the suprising difficulty of the pencil threw me off.

C 1. I don't think it's too distracting. The glue is quite clear and out of focus.

D 1. Definitely a lot of line and shape was used. The line is clear on first glance, but the shape comes to your mind soon after.
2. Repetition and unity were used a lot. The lines and use of a lot of pencils create unity through out the piece.

E 1. Not really too much, more just visual relation.
2.it probably suprised the audience that I didn't make a giant pencil out of pencils.

F 1. the ground was used because I was going for the plant look and soil can't really stay anywhere else.
2. Plant to ground. The relation is a sort of growth type bond to the floor.
3. I wish I could of made it larger to wow the audience more.
4. It sort of creates an illusion of a plant growing out of the concrete. The illusion ignores the fact that the concrete is hard and impermeable by any weaker substance.

No comments:

Post a Comment